Review



dmso group  (Beijing Solarbio Science)


Bioz Verified Symbol Beijing Solarbio Science is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Beijing Solarbio Science manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Beijing Solarbio Science dmso group
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dmso Group, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 4217 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso group/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
    Average 99 stars, based on 4217 article reviews
    dmso group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin"

    Article Title: Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin

    Journal: Poultry Science

    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106920

    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Determination of antioxidant capacity and ROS in chicken primary kidney cells treated with Cd and Cd + Tax. (A) Activities of LPO, GST, CAT, HO-1, SOD1, SOD2, NQO1, GCLC, GCLM, GPX1, and GSH. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). “C”: Control group, “DMSO”: DMSO group, “Cd + Tax”: Cd + Tax group, “Cd”: Cd group. (B) ROS production in chicken primary kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantification of ROS levels by Image J. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Determination of antioxidant capacity and ROS in chicken primary kidney cells treated with Cd and Cd + Tax. (A) Activities of LPO, GST, CAT, HO-1, SOD1, SOD2, NQO1, GCLC, GCLM, GPX1, and GSH. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). “C”: Control group, “DMSO”: DMSO group, “Cd + Tax”: Cd + Tax group, “Cd”: Cd group. (B) ROS production in chicken primary kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantification of ROS levels by Image J. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Effect of Tax on gene expression of the JNK pathway in Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Molecular docking results between Tax and JNK. (B) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay to verify the interaction between Tax and JNK. (C) Relative protein expression of p-JNK/JNK and relative mRNA expression of JNK. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of Tax on gene expression of the JNK pathway in Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Molecular docking results between Tax and JNK. (B) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay to verify the interaction between Tax and JNK. (C) Relative protein expression of p-JNK/JNK and relative mRNA expression of JNK. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Thermal Shift Assay, Expressing

    Protein and mRNA expression levels of genes related to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Protein levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. (B) Analysis of OD values of all proteins by Image J. (C) mRNA levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group ( n = 10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Protein and mRNA expression levels of genes related to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Protein levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. (B) Analysis of OD values of all proteins by Image J. (C) mRNA levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group ( n = 10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Techniques Used: Expressing



    Similar Products

    95
    TargetMol dimethyl sulfoxide
    Dimethyl Sulfoxide, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide/product/TargetMol
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dimethyl sulfoxide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Merck & Co dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso, 99.5
    Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Dmso, 99.5, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso, 99.5/product/Merck & Co
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dimethyl sulfoxide (dmso, 99.5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Shanghai Macklin Biochemical dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
    Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Shanghai Macklin Biochemical
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Beijing Solarbio Science dmso group
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dmso Group, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso group/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dmso group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Fisher Scientific dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Fisher Scientific
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Macklin Inc dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Macklin Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Macklin Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Beijing Solarbio Science dmso
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dmso, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cayman Chemical dmso
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dmso, supplied by Cayman Chemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso/product/Cayman Chemical
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Fisher Scientific dmso
    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between <t>DMSO</t> <t>group</t> and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.
    Dmso, supplied by Fisher Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso/product/Fisher Scientific
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Journal: Poultry Science

    Article Title: Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin

    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106920

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells and the antagonistic effect of Tax. (A) AO/EB staining results of chicken kidney cells. Normal cells were green; apoptotic cells were orange; necrotic cells were red (scale bar, 200 μm). (B) Hoechst 33258 staining results of chicken kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells detected by Hoechst 33258 staining. (D) The apoptosis level of primary kidney cells was detected by flow cytometry. (E) Quantitative analysis of the distribution of primary kidney cells in flow cytometry results. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group (n=10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Article Snippet: The chicken primary kidney cells were randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated into a 12-well plate: the C group (without any treatment), the DMSO group (treated with 0.1 % DMSO solvent, Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), CdCl 2 + Tax group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 + 14 μL of 0.15 μg/mL Tax), the CdCl 2 group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 ). (The cells were pretreated with Tax for 12 h before adding CdCl 2 and culturing for 24 h).

    Techniques: Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Determination of antioxidant capacity and ROS in chicken primary kidney cells treated with Cd and Cd + Tax. (A) Activities of LPO, GST, CAT, HO-1, SOD1, SOD2, NQO1, GCLC, GCLM, GPX1, and GSH. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). “C”: Control group, “DMSO”: DMSO group, “Cd + Tax”: Cd + Tax group, “Cd”: Cd group. (B) ROS production in chicken primary kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantification of ROS levels by Image J. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Journal: Poultry Science

    Article Title: Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin

    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106920

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Determination of antioxidant capacity and ROS in chicken primary kidney cells treated with Cd and Cd + Tax. (A) Activities of LPO, GST, CAT, HO-1, SOD1, SOD2, NQO1, GCLC, GCLM, GPX1, and GSH. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). “C”: Control group, “DMSO”: DMSO group, “Cd + Tax”: Cd + Tax group, “Cd”: Cd group. (B) ROS production in chicken primary kidney cells (scale bar, 200 μm). (C) Quantification of ROS levels by Image J. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Article Snippet: The chicken primary kidney cells were randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated into a 12-well plate: the C group (without any treatment), the DMSO group (treated with 0.1 % DMSO solvent, Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), CdCl 2 + Tax group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 + 14 μL of 0.15 μg/mL Tax), the CdCl 2 group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 ). (The cells were pretreated with Tax for 12 h before adding CdCl 2 and culturing for 24 h).

    Techniques: Control

    Effect of Tax on gene expression of the JNK pathway in Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Molecular docking results between Tax and JNK. (B) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay to verify the interaction between Tax and JNK. (C) Relative protein expression of p-JNK/JNK and relative mRNA expression of JNK. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Journal: Poultry Science

    Article Title: Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin

    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106920

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of Tax on gene expression of the JNK pathway in Cd-induced apoptosis of chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Molecular docking results between Tax and JNK. (B) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay to verify the interaction between Tax and JNK. (C) Relative protein expression of p-JNK/JNK and relative mRNA expression of JNK. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group (n=10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Article Snippet: The chicken primary kidney cells were randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated into a 12-well plate: the C group (without any treatment), the DMSO group (treated with 0.1 % DMSO solvent, Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), CdCl 2 + Tax group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 + 14 μL of 0.15 μg/mL Tax), the CdCl 2 group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 ). (The cells were pretreated with Tax for 12 h before adding CdCl 2 and culturing for 24 h).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Thermal Shift Assay, Expressing

    Protein and mRNA expression levels of genes related to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Protein levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. (B) Analysis of OD values of all proteins by Image J. (C) mRNA levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group ( n = 10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Journal: Poultry Science

    Article Title: Cadmium-induced apoptosis via ROS/JNK pathway in chicken primary kidney cells and antagonism of taxifolin

    doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2026.106920

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Protein and mRNA expression levels of genes related to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in chicken primary kidney cells. (A) Protein levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. (B) Analysis of OD values of all proteins by Image J. (C) mRNA levels of Bad, Bid, Bcl-2, Bax, Bak, DIABLO, XIAP, Caspase-3, and Caspase-9. * Indicates a significant difference between DMSO group and Cd group ( n = 10; * P < 0.05). # Indicates a significant difference between Cd + Tax group and Cd group ( n = 10; # P < 0.05). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or unpaired Student’s t-test.

    Article Snippet: The chicken primary kidney cells were randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated into a 12-well plate: the C group (without any treatment), the DMSO group (treated with 0.1 % DMSO solvent, Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), CdCl 2 + Tax group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 + 14 μL of 0.15 μg/mL Tax), the CdCl 2 group (treated with 67 μL of 7.5 μg/mL CdCl 2 ). (The cells were pretreated with Tax for 12 h before adding CdCl 2 and culturing for 24 h).

    Techniques: Expressing